Have Paper Prescriptions Gone the Way of the Horse and Buggy? Almost.

By Martin R. Dix on Posted in Healthcare Law, Pharmacy, Drugs, Medical Devices & Equipment, Physicians

For most Florida prescribers whose licenses haven’t renewed since 2019, it’s time to commence electronic prescribing. In 2019, the legislature enacted legislation that required electronic prescribing. However, this requirement became effective on the earlier of the prescriber’s license renewal date or July 1, 2021. Section 456.42(3), Florida Statutes requires health care practitioners to “electronically transmit prescription(s).”  This term is not defined and, while it likely was intended to mean “electronic prescribing,” it does not say that.

The requirement that practitioners electronically transmit prescriptions only applies to those health care practitioners licensed by law to prescribe (MDs, DOs, APRNs, PAs, podiatric physicians, dentists, and optometrists) who:

  • Maintain an electronic health records system (“EHR”); or
  • Prescribe medicinal drugs as an owner, employee or contractor of a licensed health care facility or practice that maintains EHR

Continue Reading

New Florida Laws Focus on Health Care

By Danielle C. Gordet and Kirk S. Davis on Posted in Healthcare Law, Healthcare Litigation, Hospitals & Health Systems, Pharmacy, Drugs, Medical Devices & Equipment, Physicians

Before closing its 2021 session, the Florida Legislature passed several bills that impact health care, summarized below.

The first bill discussed below regarding civil liability became effective on March 29, 2021. The majority of the other bills became effective on July 1, 2021. Continue Reading

Pelvic Examination Law – Florida Takes a Second Look

By Danielle C. Gordet and Kirk S. Davis on Posted in Health Care Providers, Healthcare Law, Healthcare Litigation, Hospitals & Health Systems, Physicians

The Florida medical community was left concerned and confused by the passage of the original 2020 pelvic examination law. As we discussed in our past blog, practitioners believed the law was overly burdensome, and they were unsure how to implement it. Senator Lauren Book’s new bill, SB 716, sought to make consent clear through an amendment to the original law. It became effective July 1, 2021.

The updated law revises the definition of “pelvic examination” and the situations in which consent is required for pelvic examinations. Unfortunately, the new law still misses the mark on clarifying when consent is and is not required. Due to the continued lack of clarity, it is essential that providers review policies and consent forms to ensure they understand what is required of them when conducting pelvic examinations. If appropriate policies and consent forms have not been implemented, now is the time to put them in place. Continue Reading

Group Health Plan Sponsors are Getting Serious About Pricing Transparency – Are You Keeping Up?

By Amber Roberts, Elizabeth F. Hodge, Bruce D. Platt, Thomas A. Range and Beth Alcalde on Posted in Health Care Providers, Health Insurers & Managed Care Organizations, Healthcare Law, Hospitals & Health Systems, Physicians

In early July, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Department of Labor (Labor), and the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) (collectively, the Departments), along with the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) released an interim final rule related to the No Surprises Act, legislation designed to protect patients from unexpected medical bills.

The Departments’ interim final rule arrives in the broader context of a number of new health cost transparency obligations imposed upon plan sponsors (the employers or organizations that offer group health plans to employees) beginning in early 2022. While third parties can implement many of the pricing transparency measures, plan fiduciaries must ultimately ensure compliance. As compliance deadlines for new pricing transparency requirements for group health plans draw near, plan sponsors will need to use the second half of 2021 to prepare. Continue Reading

Not Without Their Parents – No Pharmacy Services to Florida Minors without Parental Consent

By Martin R. Dix on Posted in Pharmacy, Drugs, Medical Devices & Equipment, Physicians

Pharmacists and other providers should beware of a medical consent requirement buried in the new “Parents’ Bill of Rights” signed by Governor Desantis. The law will be codified at Fla. Statutes § 1014.06 and became effective on July 1, 2021. While most see it as an educational bill that allows parents to be more involved in decisions about the education of their children, there are also requirements for “Health Care Practitioners.” The term “health care practitioners,” 456.001, F.S.,  is defined in Chapter 456, Florida Statutes, and includes all licensees and permittees authorized by the Department of Health, including pharmacists and pharmacies, physicians, nurses, etc. The law states that, except as otherwise required by law, health care practitioners, or persons employed by them, may not provide “health care services” or prescribe medicinal drugs to a minor, without first obtaining written parental consent. There is a similar requirement for health care facilities. This law does not affect most health care providers and facilities as most already seek and obtain such parental consents in advance of treating minors.  However, except for when they provide immunizations, pharmacies have not historically obtained written consents from a minor’s parents. Continue Reading

OIG Weighs In On COVID-19 Vaccination Incentives

By Elizabeth F. Hodge on Posted in Accountable Care Organizations, Health Care Providers, Health Insurers & Managed Care Organizations, Healthcare Law, Hospitals & Health Systems, Physicians

The media has widely reported that several governmental, non-profit, and private organizations, including entities in the healthcare sector, are offering a variety of incentives to encourage more individuals to take the COVID-19 vaccine. While this approach may increase the number of vaccinated individuals, it can also implicate the healthcare fraud and abuse laws when Federal healthcare program beneficiaries, e.g., Medicare participants, receive incentives to roll up their sleeves and get a shot (or two). Continue Reading

Hiding Data: Hospitals Fail to Comply with Price Transparency Requirements

By Kirk S. Davis and Danielle C. Gordet on Posted in Healthcare Law, Healthcare Litigation, Hospitals & Health Systems, Physicians

At first glance, it appeared that hospitals were complying with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) price transparency requirement, which became effective January 1, 2021. Upon a closer look; however, multiple deficiencies were found.

CMS previously advised that it would begin auditing compliance with the rule this past January. Interestingly, it was the published findings of a Wall Street Journal (WSJ) investigation that first identified non-compliance. The investigation uncovered hospitals technically posting such data but intentionally hiding it from online search engines.

The Rule

The new rule requires US hospitals to have detailed pricing information prominently displayed on their websites. The rule’s specific details are discussed in our recent blog.  Among the requirements are that standard charges be posted online. (45 CFR § 180.50).  Standard charges are “the regular rate[s] established by a hospital for an item or service provided to a specific group of paying patients.” (45 CFR § 180.20). Hospitals; however, were obscuring these standard charges from consumers. Continue Reading

Be Prepared For Increase In COVID-19 Inspections Under OSHA’s New National Emphasis Program

By Sul Kim, Lillian Chaves Moon and Jessica Travers on Posted in Health Care Providers, Healthcare Law, Hospitals & Health Systems, Senior Living

On March 12, 2021, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) announced a new National Emphasis Program (NEP) designed to significantly reduce worker exposure to COVID-19 by targeting industries and worksites where employees may have a high frequency of close-contact exposures. The new NEP on COVID-19 has two main components:

1. Increases OSHA inspections of high-hazard industries where COVID-19 exposure is expected to be prevalent. The employers will be chosen from the primary and secondary target lists as seen below:

a. Primary target list (Appendix A):

i. Healthcare industry (i.e., dentist, home health care, ambulance services, general medical and surgical hospitals, nursing care, retirement communities, assisted living facilities, etc.) Continue Reading

Providers: Cyberattacks Are Still Coming–Are You Prepared?

By Kirk S. Davis and Danielle C. Gordet on Posted in Health Care Providers, Healthcare Law, Healthcare Litigation, HIPAA, Privacy, and Data Security, Hospitals & Health Systems

Cyberattacks against healthcare providers accounted for 79% of all reported data breaches in 2020. (See here). The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) responded last month by releasing a comprehensive guide to protect providers against this growing vulnerability entitled “Healthcare System Cybersecurity Readiness & Response Considerations” (ASPR Report).

The goal of the ASPR Report is to help providers understand what must occur before, during, and after a large-scale cybersecurity incident. We have provided below a brief overview of the major strategies discussed in the ASPR Report that various types of healthcare facilities can use for a range of cybersecurity incidents.  The key points of the report can be summarized by three key concepts: Think, Remember, and Anticipate. Continue Reading

Providers: Help is Here to Avoid HIPAA Right of Access Headaches

By Kirk S. Davis and Danielle C. Gordet on Posted in Healthcare Law, Healthcare Litigation, Hospitals & Health Systems, Physicians

The Office of Civil Rights (OCR) continues to take seriously all allegations of violations of the HIPAA right of access to patient medical records. As discussed in a previous blog, the OCR is enforcing patient rights by issuing enforcement actions against healthcare providers who fail to provide patients with timely access to their medical records, in accordance with 45 CFR § 164.524(b). It is essential that providers take steps now to avoid future penalties. For purposes of this article the term “provider” refers to a “Covered Entity” under HIPAA, which includes health plans, health care providers (e.g., physicians, hospitals), and health care clearinghouses. Continue Reading

LexBlog